Daniel Schurzig

823 citations
34 papers · 596 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Schurzig

31 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

Daniel Schurzig
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Sensory Systems 156
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 462
  • Otorhinolaryngology 94
  • Speech and Hearing 52
  • Signal Processing 32
Replace Stefan Weder with:
Stefan Weder Switzerland
Thomas Klenzner Germany
Ernst von Wallenberg Germany
Renato Torres France
Philipp Mittmann Germany
Peter Erfurt Germany
Claudiu G. Treaba United States
Rolf D. Battmer Germany
Frank Risi Australia
Adrian Dalbert Switzerland
Daniel Schurzig relative to Stefan Weder Switzerland Stefan Weder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.3×
Stefan Weder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schurzig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schurzig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schurzig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schurzig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schurzig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schurzig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schurzig. The network helps show where Daniel Schurzig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schurzig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Schurzig Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Schurzig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201894
2 201079
3 201050
4 201148
5 201840
6 201637
7 201834
8 201631
9 202119
10 201219
11 202119
12 202215
13 201615
14 202214
15 201114
16 201013
17 200912
18 20218
19 20116
20 20246

About Daniel Schurzig

Daniel Schurzig is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Speech and Hearing, Otorhinolaryngology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 34 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (28 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers), Noise Effects and Management (5 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (4 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (3 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (2 papers) and Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (156 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (462 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (94 citations), Speech and Hearing (52 citations) and Signal Processing (32 citations). Daniel Schurzig has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Lenarz, Thomas S. Rau, Robert Frederick Labadie, Max Eike Timm, Omid Majdani, Robert James Webster III, Rolf Benedikt Salcher, Mary S. Dietrich, Claude N. Jolly and Andrej Kral. Their work appears in journals such as Otology & Neurotology, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Acta Oto-Laryngologica and Hearing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact