Daniel Schmid

656 citations
13 papers · 495 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Schmid

13 papers receiving 474 citations

Peers

Daniel Schmid
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 84
  • Pharmaceutical Science 33
  • Immunology 68
  • Microbiology 20
  • Emergency Medical Services 19
Replace Jameson R. Bothe with:
Jameson R. Bothe United States
Cécile Feuillie France
Paweł Wityk Poland
Marion Mathelié‐Guinlet Belgium
Laura S. Bakás Argentina
R. Seoane Spain
Mickaël Castelain France
Louic S. Vermeer United Kingdom
Hironori Tanaka Japan
Santiago D. Palma Argentina
Daniel Schmid relative to Jameson R. Bothe United States Jameson R. Bothe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×19×
Jameson R. Bothe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schmid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schmid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schmid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schmid. The network helps show where Daniel Schmid may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schmid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Schmid Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Schmid links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2000201
2 199777
3 201665
4 201535
5 201629
6 201423
7 201916
8 201816
9 202212
10 20149
11 20136
12 20225
13 20251

About Daniel Schmid

Daniel Schmid is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Condensed Matter Physics and Insect Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical and Optical Resonators (4 papers), Graphene research and applications (3 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (3 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (3 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (3 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (2 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (84 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (33 citations), Immunology (68 citations), Microbiology (20 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (19 citations). Daniel Schmid has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Franz Suter, Franziska Wandrey, Fred Zülli, Jean Claude Guillemot, Denis Loyaux, B. Paul Morgan, Karine Vidal, Michael Affolter, Leszek K. Borysiewicz and Mario O. Labéta. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Experimental Medicine, physica status solidi (b), Photonics and European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact