Daniel Schlieper

951 citations
20 papers · 672 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Schlieper

20 papers receiving 664 citations

Peers

Daniel Schlieper
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Cell Biology 194
  • Structural Biology 12
  • Molecular Biology 471
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 25
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
Replace Eva Kummer with:
Eva Kummer Switzerland
Blessy Paul Australia
Anita Kriško Croatia
Kayako Nakamura Japan
Lars Redecke Germany
Alan N. Mayer United States
Akiko Yamaji‐Hasegawa Japan
Daniel Röder Switzerland
Elaine Kirschke United States
Shaolei Teng United States
Daniel Schlieper relative to Eva Kummer Switzerland Eva Kummer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Eva Kummer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schlieper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schlieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schlieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schlieper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schlieper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schlieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schlieper. The network helps show where Daniel Schlieper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schlieper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Schlieper Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Schlieper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2005154
2 2005116
3 2002109
4 200999
5 201365
6 202039
7 201719
8 199815
9 201214
10 20156
11 20235
12 20225
13 20225
14 20204
15 20224
16 19974
17 20233
18 20173
19 20212
20 20031

About Daniel Schlieper

Daniel Schlieper is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (2 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (194 citations), Structural Biology (12 citations), Molecular Biology (471 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (25 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (12 citations). Daniel Schlieper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Linda Amos, Georg Groth, Matthew Freeman, Siniša Urban, María A. Oliva, José M. Andreu, Jan Löwe, Judith K. Paulus, M. Vollmar and Martyn Winn. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Palliative Care, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Current Biology, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact