David Santer

30 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

David Santer
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 149
  • Developmental Neuroscience 17
  • Immunology and Allergy 22
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 94
  • Cancer Research 34
Replace Christopher Prusinkiewicz with:
Christopher Prusinkiewicz Canada
Jessica Kearney United Kingdom
Honglei Zhao China
Andrew Borgman United States
Bingyuan Wu China
Robert Stephan Hines United States
Hrishikesh Shenoy United Kingdom
Hidekazu Maruyama Japan
Anastasia Plotkin United States
Cha Rajakaruna United Kingdom
David Santer relative to Christopher Prusinkiewicz Canada Christopher Prusinkiewicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Christopher Prusinkiewicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Santer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Santer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Santer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Santer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Santer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Santer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Santer. The network helps show where David Santer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Santer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Santer Line = papers co-authored together David Santer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201748
2 201539
3 201439
4 202020
5 201319
6 202019
7 202017
8 202114
9 201812
10 202010
11 20109
12 20219
13 20149
14 20198
15 20157
16 20187
17 20177
18 20237
19 20217
20 20225

About David Santer

David Santer is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (8 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (7 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (6 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (5 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (5 papers) and Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (149 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (17 citations), Immunology and Allergy (22 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (94 citations) and Cancer Research (34 citations). David Santer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Bruno K. Podesser, Karola Trescher, Attila Kiss, M. Harrer, Sandra Folkmann, Friedrich Eckstein, Gabriel Weiss, Klaus Ulrich Klein, Eva Verena Tretter and Johann Wojta. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Medicine, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, ESC Heart Failure, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact