David Santer

543 citations
38 papers · 341 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

David Santer

33 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

David Santer
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 96
  • Immunology and Allergy 22
  • Developmental Neuroscience 14
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 81
  • Cancer Research 28
Replace Karola Trescher with:
Karola Trescher Austria
Jessica Kearney United Kingdom
Kristin V. T. Engebretsen Norway
S. Baydanoff Bulgaria
Sophia Tincey United Kingdom
Johannes L. Bjørnstad Norway
Nicolle Ceneri United States
Trevor Meisinger United States
Valentina Galuppo Spain
Yoshitaka Ohmachi Japan
David Santer relative to Karola Trescher Austria Karola Trescher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Karola Trescher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Santer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Santer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Santer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Santer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Santer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Santer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Santer. The network helps show where David Santer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Santer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Santer Line = papers co-authored together David Santer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201748
2 201440
3 201539
4 202022
5 201319
6 202019
7 202017
8 202115
9 201812
10 202010
11 202110
12 20149
13 20109
14 20199
15 20157
16 20217
17 20177
18 20187
19 20237
20 20226

About David Santer

David Santer is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Epidemiology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (6 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (6 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (5 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (4 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (4 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (4 papers) and Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (96 citations), Immunology and Allergy (22 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (14 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (81 citations) and Cancer Research (28 citations). David Santer has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Bruno K. Podesser, Attila Kiss, Karola Trescher, Friedrich Eckstein, M. Harrer, Martin Krššák, Sandra Folkmann, Gabriel Weiss, Christoph Kaun and Andreas Zuckermann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, ESC Heart Failure and Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact