Daniel S. Rush

958 citations
28 papers · 678 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel S. Rush

28 papers receiving 660 citations

Peers

Daniel S. Rush
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Internal Medicine 79
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 379
  • Surgery 491
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 98
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 133
Replace Mark Langsfeld with:
Mark Langsfeld United States
Indrani Sen United States
Rajan Gupta United States
Sinan Şahin Türkiye
Peter Martin United Kingdom
Susan M. Begelman United States
R W Hobson United States
Matthew C. Bunte United States
Pierre Gouny France
P.U. Reber Switzerland
Daniel S. Rush relative to Mark Langsfeld United States Mark Langsfeld's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Mark Langsfeld · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Rush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Rush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Rush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Rush. The network helps show where Daniel S. Rush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel S. Rush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel S. Rush Line = papers co-authored together Daniel S. Rush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991149
2 200686
3 201558
4 198957
5 199456
6 201541
7 200137
8 199636
9 198823
10 200022
11 199920
12 198319
13
Penetrating injury to the carotid artery. A reappraisal of management.
198912
14 198910
15 19909
16 20038
17 19867
18 19956
19 19886
20 19963

About Daniel S. Rush

Daniel S. Rush is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pharmacology, Cancer Research and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 678 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vascular Procedures and Complications (8 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (7 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (4 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (3 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (2 papers) and Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (79 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (379 citations), Surgery (491 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (98 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (133 citations). Daniel S. Rush has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James L. Haynes, Richard M. Bell, Pavel J. Levy, William S. Miles, Raymond P. Bynoe, Morris D. Kerstein, Carlton A. Hornung, James R. Evans, Afshin A. Skibba and Eugene E. Berg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular Surgery, The American Surgeon, Journal of Surgical Research, The American Journal of Surgery and Annals of Vascular Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact