Daniel S. Peeper

28.1k citations
142 papers · 20k · 11 hit papers · h-index 55

Impact in

  • Oncology top 0.2%
    • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
    • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
    • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
    • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Physiology top 0.5%
    • Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

Papers in

    • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers 33
    • Cancer Cells and Metastasis 15
    • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways 12
    • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism 6
    • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 6

Daniel S. Peeper

140 papers receiving 19.7k citations

Daniel S. Peeper's Hit Papers

Survival and biomarker analyses from the OpACIN-neo and OpACIN neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials in stage III melanoma 2021 · 267 citations
2670+7+14Years since publication5001k1.5k2k

Peers

Daniel S. Peeper
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Oncology 6.9k
  • Physiology 3.3k
  • Aging 193
  • Cancer Research 1.6k
  • Molecular Biology 6.3k
Replace Roderick L. Beijersbergen with:
Roderick L. Beijersbergen Netherlands
Paolo Giovanni Nuciforo Spain
Lars Zender Germany
Mary W. Brooks United States
Jiřina Bártková Denmark
Ubaldo Martinez‐Outschoorn United States
Igor B. Roninson United States
Varda Rotter Israel
Elisa de Stanchina United States
Francisca Vázquez United States
Daniel S. Peeper relative to Roderick L. Beijersbergen Netherlands Roderick L. Beijersbergen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Roderick L. Beijersbergen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Peeper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Peeper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Peeper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Peeper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Peeper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Peeper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Peeper. The network helps show where Daniel S. Peeper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel S. Peeper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel S. Peeper Line = papers co-authored together Daniel S. Peeper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 142 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures promote immunotherapy response
Hit paper breakdown →
20202032
2
The human tumor microbiome is composed of tumor type–specific intracellular bacteria
Hit paper breakdown →
20201879
3
BRAFE600-associated senescence-like cell cycle arrest of human naevi
Hit paper breakdown →
20051760
4
Oncogene-Induced Senescence Relayed by an Interleukin-Dependent Inflammatory Network
Hit paper breakdown →
20081734
5
Senescence-messaging secretome: SMS-ing cellular stress
Hit paper breakdown →
2009761
6
Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma
Hit paper breakdown →
2018708
7
Interrogating open issues in cancer precision medicine with patient-derived xenografts
Hit paper breakdown →
2017547
8
A key role for mitochondrial gatekeeper pyruvate dehydrogenase in oncogene-induced senescence
Hit paper breakdown →
2013536
9 2004504
10 2014495
11 2005483
12 2005462
13
Identification of the optimal combination dosing schedule of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma (OpACIN-neo): a multicentre, phase 2, randomised, controlled trial
Hit paper breakdown →
2019426
14 2015410
15 2009369
16 1997325
17 2006301
18
Survival and biomarker analyses from the OpACIN-neo and OpACIN neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials in stage III melanoma
Hit paper breakdown →
2021267
19
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Hit paper breakdown →
2021265
20 2007228

About Daniel S. Peeper

Daniel S. Peeper is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Physiology and Immunology, having authored 142 papers that have together received 20k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (33 papers), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (28 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (25 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (15 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (12 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (6 papers), Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (6 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (6.9k citations), Physiology (3.3k citations), Aging (193 citations), Cancer Research (1.6k citations) and Molecular Biology (6.3k citations). Daniel S. Peeper has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Kuilman, Wolter J. Mooi, Chrysiis Michaloglou, Liesbeth C.W. Vredeveld, Benjamin D. Rowland, Sirith Douma, Thomas R. Geiger, René Bernards, Christophe J. Desmet and Remco van Doorn. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research, Cancer Cell, Cancer Research and Nature Cell Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact