Daniel Rueda

3.2k citations
49 papers · 2.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Rueda

48 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Daniel Rueda
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Pharmacology 1.2k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 756
  • Cancer Research 281
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 277
  • Toxicology 55
Replace M Portier with:
M Portier France
Luis González‐Feria Spain
Maria Teresa Cencioni Italy
Pingwei Zhao China
Gabriel Fried Sweden
Maurizio Cammalleri Italy
Palwinder K. Mander United Kingdom
Vitaliy Gavrilyuk United States
Annett Häußler Germany
Peter Keane United Kingdom
Daniel Rueda relative to M Portier France M Portier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.1×
M Portier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Rueda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Rueda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Rueda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Rueda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Rueda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Rueda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Rueda. The network helps show where Daniel Rueda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Rueda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Rueda Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Rueda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Inhibition of glioma growth in vivo by selective activation of the CB(2) cannabinoid receptor.
2001383
2 2008238
3 2002217
4 2000173
5 2002168
6 1998168
7 1999148
8 200188
9 200677
10 201365
11 200739
12 201526
13 201925
14 201820
15 201920
16 201120
17 201420
18 201319
19 202016
20
Classifying early-onset colorectal cancer according to tumor location: new potential subcategories to explore.
201514

About Daniel Rueda

Daniel Rueda is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (20 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (10 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (10 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (5 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (1.2k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (756 citations), Cancer Research (281 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (277 citations) and Toxicology (55 citations). Daniel Rueda has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Manuel Guzmán, Ismael Galve‐Roperh, Cristina Sánchez, Guillermo Velasco, Teresa Gómez del Pulgar, Amador Haro, Alberto Martı́nez-Serrano, Beatriz Navarro, Marı́a L. de Ceballos and C. Corbacho. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Pharmacology, Oncotarget, Scientific Reports, Clinical Genetics and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact