Daniel Roos

83 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Daniel Roos
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 536
  • Neurology 445
  • Genetics 283
  • Surgery 818
  • Oncology 423
Replace Andrew Wirth with:
Andrew Wirth Australia
Rolf‐Peter Müller Germany
Isabelle Borget France
G.R. Kerr United Kingdom
Kevin Oh United States
Paul Smith United Kingdom
David Roberge Canada
Saveli Goldberg United States
Gabriela Studer Switzerland
Augustinus D. G. Krol Netherlands
Daniel Roos relative to Andrew Wirth Australia Andrew Wirth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Andrew Wirth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Roos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Roos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Roos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Roos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Roos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Roos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Roos. The network helps show where Daniel Roos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Roos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Roos Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Roos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011271
2 2011224
3 2013210
4 2000202
5 2009155
6 2006112
7 200090
8 200384
9 200576
10 200572
11 201869
12 199867
13 200066
14 201160
15 200657
16 200550
17 201140
18 201137
19 200035
20 201733

About Daniel Roos

Daniel Roos is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Neurology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management of metastatic bone disease (19 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (16 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (15 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (7 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (536 citations), Neurology (445 citations), Genetics (283 citations), Surgery (818 citations) and Oncology (423 citations). Daniel Roos has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Edward Chow, William F. Hartsell, Peter C. O’Brien, Christopher L. Magee, Olivier de Weck, Peter Hoskin, Yvette M. van der Linden, Michael Bartoň, Gary Pratt and Michael Poulsen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Clinical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Radiation Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact