Andrew E. Potter

733 citations
34 papers · 581 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew E. Potter

34 papers receiving 554 citations

Peers

Andrew E. Potter
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 325
  • Atmospheric Science 79
  • Aerospace Engineering 82
  • Epidemiology 94
  • Neurology 40
Replace Douglas Dawson with:
Douglas Dawson United States
Y. Yoshida Japan
Tomokazu Kato Japan
Irina Sidorenko Germany
Ch. Schmitt Germany
Jean Boisson France
Y. Takizawa Japan
Sarah Tuttle United States
David F. Crawford Australia
Baptiste Klein United Kingdom
Andrew E. Potter relative to Douglas Dawson United States Douglas Dawson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Douglas Dawson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew E. Potter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew E. Potter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew E. Potter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew E. Potter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew E. Potter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew E. Potter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew E. Potter. The network helps show where Andrew E. Potter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew E. Potter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew E. Potter Line = papers co-authored together Andrew E. Potter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007113
2 200057
3 199743
4 201140
5 201137
6 201030
7 201027
8 196725
9 195425
10 199723
11 196820
12 201320
13 196015
14 201214
15
Effect of pressure and duct geometry on bluff-body flame stabilization
195812
16 201912
17 201210
18 19889
19 20087
20 19937

About Andrew E. Potter

Andrew E. Potter is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Epidemiology, Aerospace Engineering, Atmospheric Science and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 34 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astro and Planetary Science (10 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (9 papers), Space Satellite Systems and Control (6 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (4 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (4 papers), Scientific Research and Discoveries (2 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (2 papers) and Space Exploration and Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (325 citations), Atmospheric Science (79 citations), Aerospace Engineering (82 citations), Epidemiology (94 citations) and Neurology (40 citations). Andrew E. Potter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include T. H. Morgan, R. M. Killen, Daniel Roos, Andrew C. Zacest, Brian P. Brophy, S. Orsini, H. Lämmer, G. Cremonese, Herbert Lichtenegger and A. Mura. Their work appears in journals such as Icarus, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Advances in Space Research and Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact