Daniel Reznik

592 citations
20 papers · 377 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Reznik

19 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Daniel Reznik
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 311
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 70
  • General Decision Sciences 11
  • Social Psychology 52
  • Sensory Systems 11
Replace Fumihiko Taya with:
Fumihiko Taya Singapore
Anita D’Anselmo Italy
Marta Ghio Germany
Olympia Colizoli Netherlands
Nathan M. Petro United States
Geoffrey Brookshire United States
Ann L. Hartry United States
Juan M. Abolafia Spain
Elisabeth Fonteneau United Kingdom
Ιωάννα Ζιώγα United Kingdom
Daniel Reznik relative to Fumihiko Taya Singapore Fumihiko Taya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Fumihiko Taya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Reznik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Reznik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Reznik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Reznik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Reznik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Reznik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Reznik. The network helps show where Daniel Reznik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Reznik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Reznik Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Reznik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201465
2 201544
3 201543
4 201837
5 201835
6 202333
7 202427
8 201816
9 202116
10 201214
11 202011
12 202410
13 20258
14 20257
15 20206
16 20242
17 20211
18 20241
19 20261
20 20180

About Daniel Reznik

Daniel Reznik is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sensory Systems and Rehabilitation, having authored 20 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (1 paper) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (311 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (70 citations), General Decision Sciences (11 citations), Social Psychology (52 citations) and Sensory Systems (11 citations). Daniel Reznik has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Germany and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Roy Mukamel, Yael Henkin, Ori Ossmy, Christian F. Doeller, Menno P. Witter, Robert Trampel, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Samuel J. Gershman, Rahul Bhui and Hanna Hillman. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Hippocampus, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition and Current Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact