Daniel R. Vining

63 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Daniel R. Vining
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 559
  • Urban Studies 228
  • Gender Studies 260
  • Demography 320
  • Economics and Econometrics 641
Replace Pauline Grosjean with:
Pauline Grosjean Australia
Marc Augé France
Robert J. Foster United States
John Clammer Japan
William Michelson Canada
Hayden Lorimer United Kingdom
Gerald D. Berreman United States
Alan Latham United Kingdom
J. Nicholas Entrikin United States
Jeff Malpas Australia
Daniel R. Vining relative to Pauline Grosjean Australia Pauline Grosjean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.2×
Pauline Grosjean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Vining

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Vining's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Vining with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Vining more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Vining

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Vining. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Vining. The network helps show where Daniel R. Vining may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Daniel R. Vining, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel R. Vining Line = papers co-authored together Daniel R. Vining links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988419
2 1986241
3 1978171
4 1977134
5 198295
6 198781
7 198872
8 198261
9 198258
10 198455
11 197645
12 198537
13 197728
14 199527
15 198123
16 197722
17 197722
18 197821
19 197420
20 199520

About Daniel R. Vining

Daniel R. Vining is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Demography and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (13 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (8 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (8 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (7 papers), Economic theories and models (6 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (6 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (5 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (559 citations), Urban Studies (228 citations), Gender Studies (260 citations), Demography (320 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (641 citations). Daniel R. Vining has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Kontuly, Meric S. Gertler, John Whiteman, Gordon L. Clark, Thomas Sowell, F. Landis MacKellar, David A. Plane, Thomas R. Plaut, Jaime Márquez and P. D. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Environment and Planning A Economy and Space, International Regional Science Review, Population and Development Review, Papers of the Regional Science Association and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact