Daniel R. Licata

36 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers

Daniel R. Licata
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Software 91
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 225
  • Artificial Intelligence 427
  • Mathematical Physics 93
  • Geometry and Topology 62
Replace Elizabeth Scott with:
Elizabeth Scott United Kingdom
Masahito Hasegawa Japan
Anton Setzer United Kingdom
Bengt Nordström Sweden
Kent Petersson Sweden
Sava Krstić United States
Jan M. Smith Sweden
Ulrich Berger United Kingdom
Thomas Streicher Germany
Paul-André Melliès France
Daniel R. Licata relative to Elizabeth Scott United Kingdom Elizabeth Scott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Elizabeth Scott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Licata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Licata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Licata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Licata more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Licata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Licata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Licata. The network helps show where Daniel R. Licata may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Daniel R. Licata, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel R. Licata Line = papers co-authored together Daniel R. Licata links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200766
2 200435
3 201534
4 200833
5 201331
6 200930
7 201028
8 201426
9 200420
10 201219
11 201119
12 201717
13 201416
14 201915
15 201214
16 201514
17 202113
18 201313
19 201610
20 20209

About Daniel R. Licata

Daniel R. Licata is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems, Mathematical Physics and Software, having authored 39 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (35 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (17 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (15 papers), Software Engineering Research (11 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (8 papers), Security and Verification in Computing (6 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (3 papers) and Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (91 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (225 citations), Artificial Intelligence (427 citations), Mathematical Physics (93 citations) and Geometry and Topology (62 citations). Daniel R. Licata has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Robert Harper, Shriram Krishnamurthi, Michael Shulman, Jamie Morgenstern, Noam Zeilberger, Amal Ahmed, Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine, Thierry Coquand and Karl Crary. Their work appears in journals such as ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Journal of Functional Programming, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science and Lecture notes in computer science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact