Daniel Pollack

55 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers

Daniel Pollack
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Public Administration 67
  • Safety Research 30
  • Reproductive Medicine 21
  • Sociology and Political Science 106
  • Health 19
Replace Margaret S. Herrman with:
Margaret S. Herrman United States
Greg M. Shaw United States
Ceridwen Roberts United Kingdom
Richard Moorhead United Kingdom
Susanne Strauß Germany
Chak Kwan Chan United Kingdom
Jennifer A. Heerwig United States
Kirsten West United States
Dorothy E. Chunn Canada
Roderick Sluiter Netherlands
Daniel Pollack relative to Margaret S. Herrman United States Margaret S. Herrman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Margaret S. Herrman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Pollack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Pollack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Pollack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Pollack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Pollack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Pollack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Pollack. The network helps show where Daniel Pollack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Pollack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Pollack Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Pollack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199731
2 201522
3 199921
4 201417
5 201012
6 199611
7
Understanding Sexual Grooming in Child Abuse Cases.
20158
8 20068
9
Classical Religious Perpsectives of Adoption Law
20047
10
Classical Religious Perspectives of Adoption Law
20086
11 20086
12 19996
13 20226
14 20096
15 20086
16 20155
17 20055
18 19975
19
Warnings, Mitigation, and Litigation: Lessons for Research from the 1993 Floods
19944
20 20044

About Daniel Pollack

Daniel Pollack is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Public Administration and General Health Professions, having authored 64 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (11 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (9 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (6 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (5 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (67 citations), Safety Research (30 citations), Reproductive Medicine (21 citations), Sociology and Political Science (106 citations) and Health (19 citations). Daniel Pollack has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sheldon R. Gelman, Margaret Gibelman, Yuxuan Xiao, Margarita Vigodner, Edward Nieves, Myrasol Callaway, Susan E. Mason, Charles Auerbach, Charles J. Reid and Aaron Lazare. Their work appears in journals such as International Social Work, Social Work, Health & Social Work, Administration in Social Work and Adoption Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact