Daniel Picus

1.6k citations
34 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Picus

34 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel Picus
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Emergency Medical Services 352
  • Internal Medicine 121
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 696
  • Gastroenterology 114
  • Surgery 707
Replace Bertrand Janne d’Othée with:
Bertrand Janne d’Othée United States
Dana R. Burke United States
George X. Zaleski United States
Timothy L. Swan United States
Thuong Van Ha United States
Jeffrey A. Leef United States
Kimberley J. Hansen United States
LeAnn S. Stokes United States
Steven B. Oglevie United States
Baljendra Kapoor United States
Daniel Picus relative to Bertrand Janne d’Othée United States Bertrand Janne d’Othée's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Bertrand Janne d’Othée · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Picus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Picus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Picus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Picus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Picus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Picus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Picus. The network helps show where Daniel Picus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Picus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Picus Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Picus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995278
2 199095
3 199377
4 199476
5 199169
6 198667
7 199649
8 199848
9 200147
10 200343
11 199640
12 199538
13 199524
14 199020
15 200220
16 199220
17 199220
18 199218
19 199014
20 199214

About Daniel Picus

Daniel Picus is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, Internal Medicine and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vascular Procedures and Complications (6 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (6 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (4 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (4 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (3 papers) and Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (352 citations), Internal Medicine (121 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (696 citations), Gastroenterology (114 citations) and Surgery (707 citations). Daniel Picus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include Thomas M. Vesely, Michael D. Darcy, R Y Kanterman, Marshall E. Hicks, T K Pilgram, David W. Windus, Eric S. Malden, S P Quillin, Gregorio A. Sicard and M. Victoria Marx. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, Radiology, Radiologic Clinics of North America and Journal of Endourology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact