Daniel Perry

18 papers receiving 830 citations

Peers

Daniel Perry
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Aging 130
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 57
  • Management Information Systems 352
  • Strategy and Management 295
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 17
Replace Peter Lansley with:
Peter Lansley United Kingdom
Xiaoying Zheng China
Andrea Zangiacomi Italy
Attracta Brennan Ireland
Charlotte Jones Canada
William L. Cats‐Baril United States
Haiqing Song China
Estela Vilhena Portugal
Michael Naor United States
Matthew A. Schwieterman United States
Daniel Perry relative to Peter Lansley United Kingdom Peter Lansley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
Peter Lansley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Perry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Perry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Perry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Perry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Perry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Perry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Perry. The network helps show where Daniel Perry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Perry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Perry Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Perry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2006360
2 2008111
3 200780
4
In pursuit of the longevity dividend
200666
5 202157
6 200651
7 201539
8 200836
9 200031
10 202025
11 199510
12 20046
13 20106
14 20095
15
Medication-Related Problems in Aging: Implications for Professionals and Policy Makers
20013
16 20042
17 19941
18 20091

About Daniel Perry

Daniel Perry is a scholar working on Aging, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Management Information Systems, having authored 18 papers that have together received 890 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (5 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), Quality and Supply Management (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (1 paper), Health and Well-being Studies (1 paper) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (130 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (57 citations), Management Information Systems (352 citations), Strategy and Management (295 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (17 citations). Daniel Perry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jiju Antony, Maneesh Kumar, Manoj Tiwari, Ritesh Kumar Singh, S. Jay Olshansky, Robert N. Butler, Richard A. Miller, Chengbo Wang, Chengbo Wang and B.A. Carnes. Their work appears in journals such as Rejuvenation Research, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Business Process Management Journal, Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England and American Behavioral Scientist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact