Daniel Pereda

2.0k citations
69 papers · 539 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Pereda

50 papers receiving 525 citations

Peers

Daniel Pereda
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 287
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 208
  • Emergency Medicine 30
  • Internal Medicine 11
  • Surgery 135
Replace Toshinobu Kazui with:
Toshinobu Kazui United States
Elisa Mikus Italy
Mitsunori Kaneko Japan
Sabet W. Hashim United States
Flavien Vincent France
Bruce F. Landeck United States
Laila Hűbbert Sweden
Andreas Holzamer Germany
Michele La Torre Italy
Antonia Dalmer Germany
Daniel Pereda relative to Toshinobu Kazui United States Toshinobu Kazui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Toshinobu Kazui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Pereda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Pereda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Pereda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Pereda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Pereda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Pereda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Pereda. The network helps show where Daniel Pereda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Pereda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Pereda Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Pereda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201477
2 201175
3 201472
4 201435
5 201331
6 200721
7 201920
8 201019
9 200819
10 202113
11 201512
12 201010
13 201610
14 20218
15 20248
16 20208
17 20157
18 20126
19 20216
20 20216

About Daniel Pereda

Daniel Pereda is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 69 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (21 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (16 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (10 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (9 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (8 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (5 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (287 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (208 citations), Emergency Medicine (30 citations), Internal Medicine (11 citations) and Surgery (135 citations). Daniel Pereda has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include John V. Conte, Manuel Castellà, Ana García‐Álvarez, Borja Ibáñez, Valentı́n Fuster, Elena Sandoval, Jaume Agüero, Eduard Quintana, Damián Sánchez‐Quintana and Leticia Fernández‐Friera. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact