Daniel Pellicer

406 citations
36 papers · 231 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Pellicer

29 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers

Daniel Pellicer
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 211
  • Geometry and Topology 139
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 21
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 66
  • Mathematical Physics 29
Replace Roman Glebov with:
Roman Glebov Germany
Cheng Yeaw Ku Singapore
Alice Devillers Australia
Luke Postle Canada
C. Y. Tang Canada
Alina Vdovina United Kingdom
Alexey Pokrovskiy United Kingdom
Murray Elder Australia
Lê Anh Vinh Vietnam
Tim Hsu United States
Daniel Pellicer relative to Roman Glebov Germany Roman Glebov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Roman Glebov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Pellicer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Pellicer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Pellicer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Pellicer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Pellicer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Pellicer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Pellicer. The network helps show where Daniel Pellicer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Pellicer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Pellicer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Pellicer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200926
2 201325
3 200925
4 201221
5 200719
6 200812
7 201111
8 201210
9 20159
10 20128
11 20147
12 20187
13 20096
14 20145
15 20174
16 20124
17 20194
18 20174
19 20133
20 20163

About Daniel Pellicer

Daniel Pellicer is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 36 papers that have together received 231 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Finite Group Theory Research (21 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (19 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (10 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (8 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (6 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (5 papers), semigroups and automata theory (5 papers) and Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (211 citations), Geometry and Topology (139 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (21 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (66 citations) and Mathematical Physics (29 citations). Daniel Pellicer has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Asia Ivić Weiss, Thomas W. Tucker, Tomaž Pisanski, Michael I. Hartley, Javier Bracho, Steve Wilson, Marston Conder, Egon Schulte, Hiroki Koike and Primož Potočnik. Their work appears in journals such as Discrete Mathematics, Ars Mathematica Contemporanea, Discrete & Computational Geometry, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A and Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact