Daniel Palmer

871 citations
29 papers · 594 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Palmer

29 papers receiving 576 citations

Peers

Daniel Palmer
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Statistics and Probability 185
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 83
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 95
  • Education 144
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 16
Replace Alicia Che with:
Alicia Che United States
Anne B. Booker United States
Colin J. Palmer Australia
Albert Snowball United Kingdom
Hans Berger Netherlands
Kwong Joo Leck Singapore
Laura Addis United Kingdom
Kevin M. Wood United States
Efstathios B. Papachristos United States
Edwin R. Griff United States
Daniel Palmer relative to Alicia Che United States Alicia Che's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
Alicia Che · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Palmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Palmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Palmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Palmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Palmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Palmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Palmer. The network helps show where Daniel Palmer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Palmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Palmer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Palmer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012187
2 200758
3 200754
4 201945
5 200545
6 201934
7 202129
8 202220
9 200513
10 199913
11 201612
12 199410
13 20188
14 20227
15 20017
16 20197
17 20177
18 20026
19 20175
20 20065

About Daniel Palmer

Daniel Palmer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Organic Chemistry, having authored 29 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fern and Epiphyte Biology (8 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (4 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (3 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (3 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (3 papers) and Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (185 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (83 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (95 citations), Education (144 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (16 citations). Daniel Palmer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Ansari, Gavin R. Price, Christian Battista, Victoria L. Workman, Peter Kille, Stephen B. Dunnett, Marco A. M. Prado, Boyer D. Winters, Ray V. H. Jones and Peter N. Preston. Their work appears in journals such as American Fern Journal, Behavioural Brain Research, Nature Communications, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory and Chemical Engineering Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact