Daniel Murphy

19 papers receiving 372 citations

Peers

Daniel Murphy
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Virology 78
  • Infectious Diseases 115
  • Emergency Medicine 49
  • Rehabilitation 34
  • Surgery 164
Replace Amit Mitra with:
Amit Mitra United States
Christos Michailidis United Kingdom
Lisa Block United States
Paul Harrington Ireland
Georges F. Penneçot France
Laurel A. Donnell‐Fink United States
Stephen B. Schnall United States
Jo Dartnell United Kingdom
Dennis B. Phelps United States
F.K. Ip China
Daniel Murphy relative to Amit Mitra United States Amit Mitra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Amit Mitra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Murphy. The network helps show where Daniel Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Murphy Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Murphy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995110
2 201050
3 201547
4 202222
5 201221
6 202119
7 202019
8 201117
9 202117
10 201815
11 202111
12 199611
13 20218
14 20144
15 20224
16 20224
17 20232
18 20192
19 20221
20 20250

About Daniel Murphy

Daniel Murphy is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (4 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (3 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (3 papers), Potassium and Related Disorders (3 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (3 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (2 papers), Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques (2 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (78 citations), Infectious Diseases (115 citations), Emergency Medicine (49 citations), Rehabilitation (34 citations) and Surgery (164 citations). Daniel Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joseph M. Failla, Mark P. Koniuch, Yael Gelfer, Nicholaos Bellos, Mark S. Shaefer, Lisa Ross, Kathleen Squires, Henry Zhao, Benjamin Young and Edwin DeJesus. Their work appears in journals such as EFORT Open Reviews, PLoS ONE, BMC Medical Education, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing and European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact