Daniel Moldt

1.4k citations
106 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Moldt

96 papers receiving 980 citations

Peers

Daniel Moldt
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Management Information Systems 516
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 362
  • Software 82
  • Information Systems 435
  • Artificial Intelligence 520
Replace Fabio Patrizi with:
Fabio Patrizi Italy
Roelf J. Wieringa Netherlands
Yves Lespérance Canada
Andrea Bracciali Italy
Marco Schaerf Italy
Marina Ribaudo Italy
José Luiz Fiadeiro United Kingdom
Enrico Denti Italy
Harald Störrle Denmark
Bikram Sengupta India
Daniel Moldt relative to Fabio Patrizi Italy Fabio Patrizi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Fabio Patrizi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Moldt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Moldt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Moldt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Moldt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Moldt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Moldt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Moldt. The network helps show where Daniel Moldt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Moldt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Moldt Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Moldt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005150
2 2004103
3 200382
4 199774
5 200163
6 200354
7 200551
8 200447
9 200330
10 200629
11 200126
12 200521
13
Inheritance of dynamic behaviour in UML
200218
14
Enacting interorganizational workflows using nets in nets
199918
15 200617
16 200316
17 200912
18
Workflow Modelling and Execution with Coloured Petri Nets in COSM
199512
19 200411
20 200010

About Daniel Moldt

Daniel Moldt is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 106 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Business Process Modeling and Analysis (61 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (39 papers), Petri Nets in System Modeling (32 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (28 papers), Mobile Agent-Based Network Management (16 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (11 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (5 papers) and Simulation Techniques and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (516 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (362 citations), Software (82 citations), Information Systems (435 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (520 citations). Daniel Moldt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Algeria. Frequent co-authors include Heiko Rölke, Michael Köhler, Winfried Lamersdorf, Lars Braubach, Alexander Pokahr, Christian von Scheve, Rüdiger Valk, Olaf Kummer, J. W. Schumacher and Wil M. P. van der Alast. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in computer science, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Lecture notes in business information processing, EMISA FORUM and Springer eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact