Daniel Mercier

26 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

Daniel Mercier
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 102
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 184
  • Condensed Matter Physics 24
  • Materials Chemistry 52
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 60
Replace Andreas Sonntag with:
Andreas Sonntag Germany
Thiago J. A. Mori Brazil
A. Vonlanthen Switzerland
J. Lohau Germany
A. A. Klimov Russia
B. A. Philips United States
Guillemin Rodary France
Gero Wittich Germany
Mingyu Zhu United States
Suhaila Maluf Shibli Brazil
Daniel Mercier relative to Andreas Sonntag Germany Andreas Sonntag's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Andreas Sonntag · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Mercier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Mercier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Mercier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Mercier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Mercier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Mercier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Mercier. The network helps show where Daniel Mercier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Mercier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Mercier Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Mercier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000124
2 200153
3 199133
4 198228
5 198322
6 198416
7 200215
8 198212
9 200110
10 200310
11 19829
12 19849
13 19916
14 19926
15 19956
16 19955
17 19965
18 19995
19 19914
20 19792

About Daniel Mercier

Daniel Mercier is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Mathematical Physics, Condensed Matter Physics and Acoustics and Ultrasonics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (15 papers), Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings (3 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (3 papers), Quasicrystal Structures and Properties (3 papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (3 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (2 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (1 paper) and X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (102 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (184 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (24 citations), Materials Chemistry (52 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (60 citations). Daniel Mercier has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Jean-Claude Serge Lévy, H. Puszkarski, Maciej Krawczyk, Guillaume Viau, O. Acher, Françoise Fiévet-Vincent, Ph. Toneguzzo, Fernand Fiévet, Georges Maurin and J. Amblard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Physics Letters A, Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter and IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact