Daniel Magee

35 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

Daniel Magee
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 50
  • Reproductive Medicine 105
  • Oncology 158
  • Biological Psychiatry 14
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 39
Replace Cherié L. Butts with:
Cherié L. Butts United States
Piotr L. Dorniak United States
Tomohiro Yonezawa Japan
Fabio Spreafico Italy
Syed Hamid Ali United States
Maria-Cristina Keightley Australia
Xiu-Ying Huang China
Andrea Mercedes Canellada Argentina
Rita G. Domingues Portugal
Eri Nakamura Japan
Daniel Magee relative to Cherié L. Butts United States Cherié L. Butts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Cherié L. Butts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Magee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Magee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Magee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Magee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Magee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Magee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Magee. The network helps show where Daniel Magee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Magee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Magee Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Magee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201987
2 201574
3 201456
4 202149
5 202048
6 201744
7 201440
8 201440
9 202135
10 202233
11 202331
12 201427
13 201427
14 201722
15 201621
16 201819
17 201819
18 202416
19 201815
20 202513

About Daniel Magee

Daniel Magee is a scholar working on Oncology, Modeling and Simulation, Cancer Research, Epidemiology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 795 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (4 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (4 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (3 papers), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (3 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (3 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (50 citations), Reproductive Medicine (105 citations), Oncology (158 citations), Biological Psychiatry (14 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (39 citations). Daniel Magee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Matthew J. During, Matthew Scotch, Lei Cao, Travis B. McMurphy, Eugene Choi, Meng Sun, En-Ju Deborah Lin, Xianglan Liu, Chuansong Wang and Marc A. Suchard. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Annals of Oncology, Journal of Economic Entomology, Clinical Cancer Research and Infection Genetics and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact