Daniel M. Smith

1.8k citations
108 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel M. Smith

94 papers receiving 953 citations

Peers

Daniel M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Political Science and International Relations 687
  • Gender Studies 247
  • Strategy and Management 172
  • Communication 51
  • Sociology and Political Science 267
Replace M. V. Hood with:
M. V. Hood United States
Eric R. Hansen United States
Theo Farrell United Kingdom
Chris Tausanovitch United States
A. H. Birch United Kingdom
Dieter Fuchs Germany
Sally J. Kenney United States
Paul Copeland United Kingdom
Roy Pierce United States
Charles Tien United States
Daniel M. Smith relative to M. V. Hood United States M. V. Hood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
M. V. Hood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Smith. The network helps show where Daniel M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010114
2 201856
3 201845
4 201644
5 202037
6 202035
7 201632
8 196932
9 201831
10 202230
11 201929
12 201629
13 196327
14 201724
15 201423
16
Succeeding in Politics: Dynasties in Democracies
201218
17 199518
18 201518
19 202118
20 201617

About Daniel M. Smith

Daniel M. Smith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management, having authored 108 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (33 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (20 papers), 3D IC and TSV technologies (19 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (14 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (13 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (12 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (9 papers) and Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (687 citations), Gender Studies (247 citations), Strategy and Management (172 citations), Communication (51 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (267 citations). Daniel M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jon H. Fiva, Kaare W. Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, Gary W. Cox, Shane Martin, Teppei Yamamoto, Yusaku Horiuchi, Gabriel Kolko, Johanna Rickne and Olle Folke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The Journal of Southern History, The Journal of Politics, Electoral Studies and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact