Daniel M. Pendleton

5 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

Daniel M. Pendleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 159
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 29
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 105
  • Applied Psychology 21
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 58
Replace Sabine Kubesch with:
Sabine Kubesch Germany
Anne Kær Gejl Denmark
Shu‐Shih Hsieh Taiwan
Chun-Chih Wang Taiwan
Thiago Teixeira Guimarães Brazil
Rita Casella Italy
Amanda L. McGowan United States
Madison C. Chandler United States
Thais Cevada Brazil
James Zagrodnik United States
Daniel M. Pendleton relative to Sabine Kubesch Germany Sabine Kubesch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sabine Kubesch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Pendleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Pendleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Pendleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Pendleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Pendleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Pendleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Pendleton. The network helps show where Daniel M. Pendleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Pendleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Pendleton Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Pendleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Daniel M. Pendleton

Daniel M. Pendleton is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 5 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (1 paper), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (1 paper) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (159 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (29 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (105 citations), Applied Psychology (21 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (58 citations). Daniel M. Pendleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Phillip D. Tomporowski, Caterina Pesce, Bryan A. McCullick, Aaron T. Piepmeier, Katie Becofsky, Laurie Wideman, Jennifer L. Etnier and Jeffrey D. Labban. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, International Journal of Psychophysiology, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport and Journal of sport and health science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact