Daniel M. Horowitz

38 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Daniel M. Horowitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Biomaterials 612
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 104
  • Literature and Literary Theory 357
  • Language and Linguistics 295
  • Pollution 213
Replace John R. Clegg with:
John R. Clegg United States
Robert F. Debski Poland
Bettina Liebowitz Knapp Germany
Jonathan M. Crowther United Kingdom
ALAN K. KEENAN Ireland
Lee Su Kim South Korea
Catherine Anne O'Connor Ireland
Miki Mori Japan
Yi‐Chang Liu Taiwan
Roger W. Pearson United States
Daniel M. Horowitz relative to John R. Clegg United States John R. Clegg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×53.3×
John R. Clegg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Horowitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Horowitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Horowitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Horowitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Horowitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Horowitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Horowitz. The network helps show where Daniel M. Horowitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Horowitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Horowitz Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Horowitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999416
2 2011326
3 1986237
4 1986120
5 2016109
6 1986102
7 199496
8 201783
9 200272
10 199251
11 198639
12 199935
13 200033
14 200833
15 201832
16 199024
17 199324
18 199523
19 199417
20 199116

About Daniel M. Horowitz

Daniel M. Horowitz is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Immunology and Process Chemistry and Technology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (9 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (7 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (5 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (4 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (3 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (3 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (3 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (612 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (104 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (357 citations), Language and Linguistics (295 citations) and Pollution (213 citations). Daniel M. Horowitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Simon F. Williams, Oliver P. Peoples, David P. Martin, Jeremy K. M. Sanders, Andrew G. S. King, Fred Baribaud, Thomas J. Richards, Carrie M. Brodmerkel, Louis J. Vuga and Kathleen O. Lindell. Their work appears in journals such as TESOL Quarterly, Journal of the American Chemical Society, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, English for Specific Purposes and American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact