Daniel M. Chafets

18 papers receiving 652 citations

Peers

Daniel M. Chafets
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 181
  • Immunology 287
  • Biochemistry 77
  • Parasitology 53
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 161
Replace Megan E. Laycock with:
Megan E. Laycock United States
A. Massougbodji Benin
Nathalie Désiré France
Malin Stoltz Sweden
Christine J. Swardson United States
G. Georgiev Bulgaria
M. Julia B. Felippe United States
Harvey R. Fischman United States
Junko Yokoo Japan
Marcelo Antônio Pascoal-Xavier Brazil
Daniel M. Chafets relative to Megan E. Laycock United States Megan E. Laycock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Megan E. Laycock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Chafets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Chafets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Chafets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Chafets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Chafets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Chafets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Chafets. The network helps show where Daniel M. Chafets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Chafets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Chafets Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Chafets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200599
2 201584
3 200564
4 200464
5 201659
6 200452
7 201350
8 200648
9 200645
10 200827
11 201425
12 201519
13 201013
14 201810
15 20209
16 20188
17 20252
18 20251
19 20260

About Daniel M. Chafets

Daniel M. Chafets is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Immunology, Infectious Diseases, Genetics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood transfusion and management (4 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (4 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (2 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (2 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (1 paper), HIV Research and Treatment (1 paper) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (181 citations), Immunology (287 citations), Biochemistry (77 citations), Parasitology (53 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (161 citations). Daniel M. Chafets has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Tzong‐Hae Lee, Michael P. Busch, Catharie C. Nass, Edward L. Murphy, Sonia Bakkour, Donna Smith, Baoguang Wang, William Reed, Garth H. Utter and Wen Li. Their work appears in journals such as Transfusion, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vox Sanguinis, Cell Reports and JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact