Daniel Lytle

413 citations
20 papers · 258 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Lytle

20 papers receiving 219 citations

Peers

Daniel Lytle
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Health 49
  • Political Science and International Relations 147
  • Sociology and Political Science 183
  • Gender Studies 28
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 1
Replace Reino Sirén with:
Reino Sirén Finland
Bocar Ba United States
Daniel S. Lawrence United States
Matthew Radburn United Kingdom
Roman Rivera United States
Julie Barkworth Australia
Kevin Buckler United States
Anthony Gregory United States
Branko Lobnikar Slovenia
Sarah J. McLean United States
Daniel Lytle relative to Reino Sirén Finland Reino Sirén's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Reino Sirén · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lytle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lytle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lytle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lytle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lytle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lytle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lytle. The network helps show where Daniel Lytle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Lytle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Lytle Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Lytle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202064
2 201443
3 200828
4 201523
5 202020
6 202018
7 201516
8 200812
9
A meta-analysis of suspect demographic characteristics and American police officer search decisions
20187
10 20206
11 20065
12 20104
13
Decision Making in Criminal Justice Revisited: Toward a General Theory of Criminal Justice
20133
14 20082
15 20082
16 20251
17 20091
18 20211
19 20101
20 20061

About Daniel Lytle

Daniel Lytle is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Health, General Health Professions and Social Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (11 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (10 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (3 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (1 paper), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (1 paper) and Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (49 citations), Political Science and International Relations (147 citations), Sociology and Political Science (183 citations), Gender Studies (28 citations) and Life-span and Life-course Studies (1 citation). Daniel Lytle has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include P. Colin Bolger, Ryan Randa, Jonathan Intravia, Lawrence F. Travis, Dale Willits, Carol A. Archbold, Robert A. Hewitt, Jeff Delaune, Shreyansh Daftry and Larry Matthies. Their work appears in journals such as Policing An International Journal, Journal of Criminal Justice, Deviant Behavior, International Criminal Justice Review and Journal of Crime and Justice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact