Daniel Levitis
Impact in
- Aging top 10%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Papers in
-
- Plant and animal studies 5
- Lichen and fungal ecology 1
- Aging 2
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms 2
- Co-authors
- William Z. Lidicker (1 shared paper)Laurie Bingaman Lackey (2 shared papers)Oskar Bürger (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Sherman (1 shared paper)Anne Pringle (4 shared papers)Daniel E. Martínez (1 shared paper)William H. Batchelder (1 shared paper)Paul H. Dunn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (2 papers)Animal Behaviour (1 paper)Heredity (1 paper)Frontiers in Genetics (1 paper)PeerJ (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmarkGermany
In The Last Decade
Daniel Levitis
14 papers receiving 440 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Aging 35
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 75
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 91
- Social Psychology 83
- Ecology 97
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Levitis
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Levitis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Levitis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Levitis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Levitis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Levitis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Levitis. The network helps show where Daniel Levitis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Levitis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 219 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 1 |
About Daniel Levitis
Daniel Levitis is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Aging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Oceanography and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 14 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (2 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (2 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (2 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (1 paper) and Echinoderm biology and ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (35 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (75 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (91 citations), Social Psychology (83 citations) and Ecology (97 citations). Daniel Levitis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include William Z. Lidicker, Laurie Bingaman Lackey, Oskar Bürger, Elizabeth Sherman, Anne Pringle, Daniel E. Martínez, William H. Batchelder, Paul H. Dunn, Katherine A. Faust and Zita Oravecz. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Animal Behaviour, Heredity, Frontiers in Genetics and PeerJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.