Daniel Levitis

615 citations
14 papers · 393 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Levitis

14 papers receiving 383 citations

Peers

Daniel Levitis
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Aging 34
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 67
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 80
  • Social Psychology 76
  • Ecology 85
Replace Caroline Deimel with:
Caroline Deimel Germany
Stan Braude United States
Morgane Tidière France
Milena R. Shattuck United States
Donna J. Holmes United States
Yong Zhi Foo Australia
Shannen L. Robson United States
Nicole Thompson González United States
Laura R. Stein United States
Matthew N. Zipple United States
Daniel Levitis relative to Caroline Deimel Germany Caroline Deimel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Caroline Deimel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Levitis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Levitis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Levitis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Levitis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Levitis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Levitis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Levitis. The network helps show where Daniel Levitis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Levitis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Levitis Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Levitis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2009177
2 201355
3 201048
4 201134
5 200324
6 201714
7 201310
8 201510
9 20159
10 20164
11 20234
12 20162
13 20151
14 20131

About Daniel Levitis

Daniel Levitis is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 14 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (2 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (2 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (1 paper) and Cephalopods and Marine Biology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (34 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (67 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (80 citations), Social Psychology (76 citations) and Ecology (85 citations). Daniel Levitis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include William Z. Lidicker, Laurie Bingaman Lackey, Oskar Bürger, Elizabeth Sherman, Anne Pringle, Daniel E. Martínez, Paul H. Dunn, Kim Lundgreen, Zita Oravecz and William H. Batchelder. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Fungal ecology, Heredity, Frontiers in Genetics and Biological Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact