Daniel Leas

20 papers receiving 222 citations

Peers

Daniel Leas
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 37
  • Surgery 178
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 59
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 10
  • Pharmacology 42
Replace J. Logan Brock with:
J. Logan Brock United States
Usman Ali M. Syed United States
Michael A. McHugh United States
Diane J. Morton United States
Trevor R. Grace United States
Buddhadev Chowdhury India
George A. Beyer United States
Tyler J. Vovos United States
Matthew J. Sabatino United States
Jonathan W. Cheah United States
Daniel Leas relative to J. Logan Brock United States J. Logan Brock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
J. Logan Brock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Leas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Leas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Leas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Leas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Leas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Leas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Leas. The network helps show where Daniel Leas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Leas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Leas Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Leas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201742
2 201439
3 201928
4 201620
5 201720
6 202213
7 201311
8 20218
9 20188
10 20188
11 20167
12 20195
13
Opioid Prescribing in the Pediatric Orthopaedic Trauma Population.
20194
14 20223
15 20163
16 20213
17 20232
18
Opioid Prescribing and Patient Satisfaction Scores Across Practice Types.
20202
19 20201
20 20161

About Daniel Leas

Daniel Leas is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 228 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (14 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (37 citations), Surgery (178 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (59 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (10 citations) and Pharmacology (42 citations). Daniel Leas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Bennett D. Grimm, Donald R. Johnson, Madhav A. Karunakar, Donald F. D’Alessandro, Kevin J. Bozic, Eric F. Swart, Meghan K. Wally, Nady Hamid, Rachel B. Seymour and Katherine Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact