Daniel Laufer

70 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Daniel Laufer
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Marketing 515
  • Communication 317
  • Pharmaceutical Science 251
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 389
  • Spectroscopy 407
Replace Margaret L. Williams with:
Margaret L. Williams United States
David Holtz United States
S. Narasimhan India
Ashok K. Gupta India
James A. Cunningham United Kingdom
Haiyang Li China
Richard S. Glass United States
Aaron Smith United States
Richard J. Fox United States
L. Sacconi Italy
Daniel Laufer relative to Margaret L. Williams United States Margaret L. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.6×
Margaret L. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Laufer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Laufer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Laufer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Laufer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Laufer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Laufer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Laufer. The network helps show where Daniel Laufer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Laufer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Laufer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Laufer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010406
2 2006158
3 1981148
4 2018143
5 198084
6 200382
7 197981
8 198376
9 200573
10 201271
11 198263
12 201751
13 196848
14 200945
15 197841
16 198239
17 201938
18 196738
19 197237
20 200836

About Daniel Laufer

Daniel Laufer is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Communication and Spectroscopy, having authored 76 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (13 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (11 papers), Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (8 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (6 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (6 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (6 papers) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (515 citations), Communication (317 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (251 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (389 citations) and Spectroscopy (407 citations). Daniel Laufer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Robert I. Gelb, Lowell M. Schwartz, Yany Grégoire, Thomas M. Tripp, Kate Gillespie, David H. Silvera, Robert F. Johnson, Beatriz H. Cardelino, Tamar Avnet and Elkan Blout. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Business Horizons, Public Relations Review, Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data and Bioorganic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact