Daniel Laqua
Impact in
- History top 1%
- Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
- French Historical and Cultural Studies
- History, Culture, and Diplomacy
-
- World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
- Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
- European history and politics
Papers in
- History 20
- French Historical and Cultural Studies 11
- Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics 6
- European Political History Analysis 4
- History, Culture, and Diplomacy 3
-
- Communism, Protests, Social Movements 4
Daniel Laqua
26 papers receiving 166 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- History 111
- Political Science and International Relations 80
- Space and Planetary Science 4
- Library and Information Sciences 4
- Life-span and Life-course Studies 2
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Laqua
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Laqua's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Laqua with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Laqua more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Laqua
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Laqua. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Laqua. The network helps show where Daniel Laqua may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Laqua, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 54 | |
| 2 | The age of internationalism and Belgium, 1880–1930: Peace, progress and prestige | 2013 | 23 |
| 3 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 10 | International Organizations and Global Civil Society: Histories of the Union of International Associations | 2019 | 4 |
| 11 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 2 |
About Daniel Laqua
Daniel Laqua is a scholar working on History, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science and Anthropology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 198 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Historical and Cultural Studies (11 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (6 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (6 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (4 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (4 papers), European Political History Analysis (4 papers), History, Culture, and Diplomacy (3 papers) and World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (111 citations), Political Science and International Relations (80 citations), Space and Planetary Science (4 citations), Library and Information Sciences (4 citations) and Life-span and Life-course Studies (2 citations). Daniel Laqua has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Georgina Brewis and Thomas Davies. Their work appears in journals such as Labour History Review, History, Social History, Revue belge de philologie et d histoire and Library trends.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.