Daniel L. Friedman

34 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Daniel L. Friedman
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Sensory Systems 207
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 275
  • Molecular Biology 1.0k
  • Cell Biology 214
  • Biochemistry 89
Replace I. Schulz with:
I. Schulz Germany
H. Streb Germany
Georges Guellaën France
Thierry Capiod France
Christophe Vandier France
Takashi Kuramoto Japan
Akihiko Mishima Japan
Carole L. Jelsema United States
Takashi Chijiwa Japan
Eva M. Eves United States
Daniel L. Friedman relative to I. Schulz Germany I. Schulz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
I. Schulz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. Friedman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. Friedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. Friedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. Friedman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel L. Friedman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. Friedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. Friedman. The network helps show where Daniel L. Friedman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Daniel L. Friedman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel L. Friedman Line = papers co-authored together Daniel L. Friedman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976246
2 1963238
3 1968137
4 2000113
5 200390
6 200077
7 198173
8 196969
9 197653
10 202143
11 198441
12 197437
13 196537
14 198936
15 198836
16 197036
17 196029
18 196229
19
Absence of an effect of amethopterin and 5-fluorodeoxyuridine upon levels of thymidine triphosphate in HeLa cells.
197126
20 198524

About Daniel L. Friedman

Daniel L. Friedman is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics and Biochemistry, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (6 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (3 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (3 papers) and Iron Metabolism and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (207 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (275 citations), Molecular Biology (1.0k citations), Cell Biology (214 citations) and Biochemistry (89 citations). Daniel L. Friedman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Larner, Ben W. Strowbridge, Gerald C. Mueller, Joseph R. Stern, Brian Halabisky, Thomas H. Claus, Simon J. Pilkis, Roger A. Johnson, Earl W. Sutherland and Stanley F. Barnett. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Neurophysiology, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact