Daniel Krofcheck

1.2k citations
27 papers · 601 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Krofcheck

26 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers

Daniel Krofcheck
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Global and Planetary Change 406
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 187
  • Ecology 348
  • Environmental Engineering 134
  • Ecological Modeling 35
Replace Aline Pontes Lopes with:
Aline Pontes Lopes Brazil
Alexey Shiklomanov United States
Marion Pause Germany
Jing M Chen Canada
Robert A. Chastain United States
Veronique V. Cheret France
Eugénie Paul‐Limoges Switzerland
Titta Majasalmi Finland
Paweł Hawryło Poland
Sergio Marconi United States
Daniel Krofcheck relative to Aline Pontes Lopes Brazil Aline Pontes Lopes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Aline Pontes Lopes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Krofcheck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Krofcheck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Krofcheck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Krofcheck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Krofcheck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Krofcheck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Krofcheck. The network helps show where Daniel Krofcheck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Krofcheck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Krofcheck Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Krofcheck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011215
2 201750
3 201743
4 201730
5 201629
6 202228
7 202126
8 201325
9 202025
10 201925
11 201916
12 201513
13 201913
14 201812
15 201911
16 20199
17 20215
18 20125
19 20234
20 20214

About Daniel Krofcheck

Daniel Krofcheck is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Atmospheric Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 601 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fire effects on ecosystems (18 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (15 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (9 papers), Forest ecology and management (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (4 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (406 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (187 citations), Ecology (348 citations), Environmental Engineering (134 citations) and Ecological Modeling (35 citations). Daniel Krofcheck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Matthew D. Hurteau, M. E. Litvak, Lee A. Vierling, Urs Schulthess, Jan U.H. Eitel, Dan S. Long, Alan A. Ager, E. Louise Loudermilk, Robert M. Scheller and A. Keyser. Their work appears in journals such as Ecosphere, Remote Sensing of Environment, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, Remote Sensing and Global Change Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact