Daniel Klooster

937 citations
15 papers · 781 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Klooster

14 papers receiving 683 citations

Peers

Daniel Klooster
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Global and Planetary Change 490
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 152
  • Business and International Management 34
  • Strategy and Management 173
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 60
Replace Juan Manuel Torres‐Rojo with:
Juan Manuel Torres‐Rojo Mexico
Camille Antinori United States
Roger Alex Clapp Canada
Dan Klooster United States
Tiago N.P. dos Reis Belgium
Jessica de Koning Netherlands
Irmeli Mustalahti Finland
Émilie Coudel France
Frank Matose South Africa
A. White United States
Daniel Klooster relative to Juan Manuel Torres‐Rojo Mexico Juan Manuel Torres‐Rojo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Juan Manuel Torres‐Rojo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Klooster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Klooster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Klooster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Klooster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Klooster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Klooster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Klooster. The network helps show where Daniel Klooster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Klooster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Klooster Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Klooster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2000200
2 2000198
3 200589
4 200283
5 199947
6 200247
7 201826
8 200522
9 201722
10 201318
11 201513
12
Institutional Choice, Community, and Struggle: A Case Study of Forest Co-Management in Mexico
20019
13 20226
14 20011
15 20210

About Daniel Klooster

Daniel Klooster is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 781 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (9 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (8 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (3 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (1 paper) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (490 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (152 citations), Business and International Management (34 citations), Strategy and Management (173 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (60 citations). Daniel Klooster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Omar Masera, James P. Robson, Tad Mutersbaugh, Marie‐Christine Renard and Peter Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Economic Geography, Population and Environment, Journal of Agrarian Change, Journal of Rural Studies and Global Environmental Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact