Daniel Kirk

28 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

Daniel Kirk
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Health Informatics 26
  • General Decision Sciences 12
  • Health Information Management 18
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 86
  • Genetics 72
Replace Ya Lu with:
Ya Lu Switzerland
Tian Gao China
Ilias Papastratis Greece
Tagne Poupi Theodore Armand South Korea
Hamza Osman İlhan Türkiye
Maria João M. Vasconcelos Portugal
Mikael Nilsson Sweden
Cynthia Cheung United States
Matthias Reumann Germany
Andrej Kastrin Slovenia
Daniel Kirk relative to Ya Lu Switzerland Ya Lu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Ya Lu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Kirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Kirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Kirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Kirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Kirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Kirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Kirk. The network helps show where Daniel Kirk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Kirk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Kirk Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Kirk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021127
2 202285
3 202336
4 198529
5 200123
6 202418
7 198614
8 197814
9
Problem Analysis, Resolution and Ranking (PARR) Development and Assessment
20018
10 20226
11 20046
12 19826
13
A case study on nurse-led asthma clinic in rural Western Australia
20115
14 19675
15 20194
16 20034
17 20243
18 20023
19 20253
20
Description of URET Enhancements to Support Severe Weather Avoidance
20043

About Daniel Kirk

Daniel Kirk is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Social Psychology, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Genetics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Air Traffic Management and Optimization (11 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (5 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (4 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (4 papers), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (4 papers), Simulation Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers) and Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (26 citations), General Decision Sciences (12 citations), Health Information Management (18 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (86 citations) and Genetics (72 citations). Daniel Kirk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bedir Teki̇nerdoğan, Cagatay Catal, Guido Camps, E.J. Kok, Edith J. M. Feskens, M. Alpern, Edward N. Pugh, Clyde H. Coombs, Li Deng and Ricardo Costeira. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Cell Reports, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism and Vision Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact