Daniel Keppeler

825 citations
17 papers · 592 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Keppeler

16 papers receiving 574 citations

Peers

Daniel Keppeler
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Sensory Systems 89
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 341
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 221
  • Structural Biology 15
  • Condensed Matter Physics 52
Replace Marcus Jeschke with:
Marcus Jeschke Germany
Roland Hessler Austria
Valeria Piazza Mexico
Alexander Dieter Germany
Carlos J. Duque-Afonso Germany
Minxu Li United States
Michael Schwaerzle Germany
Massimo Reconditi Italy
Anne Kurtenbach Germany
Logan A. Thomas United States
Daniel Keppeler relative to Marcus Jeschke Germany Marcus Jeschke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Marcus Jeschke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Keppeler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Keppeler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Keppeler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Keppeler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Keppeler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Keppeler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Keppeler. The network helps show where Daniel Keppeler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Keppeler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Keppeler Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Keppeler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2014155
2 201877
3 201877
4 202066
5 202060
6 202038
7 202127
8 201825
9 202223
10 202213
11 202212
12 202310
13 20244
14 20233
15 20221
16 20211
17 20210

About Daniel Keppeler

Daniel Keppeler is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Plant Science, Biomedical Engineering and Surgery, having authored 17 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Light effects on plants (2 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (1 paper), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (1 paper) and Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (89 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (341 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (221 citations), Structural Biology (15 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (52 citations). Daniel Keppeler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tobias Moser, Alexander Dieter, Gerhard Hoch, Christian Wrobel, Oliver Paul, Patrick Ruther, Marcus Jeschke, Christian Vogl, Vladan Rankovic and Antoine Huet. Their work appears in journals such as EMBO Molecular Medicine, Applied Optics, Science Translational Medicine, Materials and The EMBO Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact