Daniel Kaplowitz

667 citations
13 papers · 554 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
    • Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
    • Child Abuse and Trauma
    • Migration, Health and Trauma
    • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
    • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence

Papers in

    • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 6
    • Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research 6
    • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 2
    • Psychology and Mental Health 1
    • Psychological Treatments and Disorders 1
    • Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics 1
    • Counseling Practices and Supervision 3

Daniel Kaplowitz

11 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers

Daniel Kaplowitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Clinical Psychology 376
  • Health 35
  • Social Psychology 74
  • General Psychology 7
  • Applied Psychology 14
Replace Robert D. Strochak with:
Robert D. Strochak United States
Ernest S. Wolf United States
Robert P. Knight United States
Patricia Ann Jakubowski United States
Benjamin J. Becker United States
William G. Herron United States
Bernard Brandchaft United States
Harold R. Keller United States
Hanna E. Kapit
Martin Symonds United States
Daniel Kaplowitz relative to Robert D. Strochak United States Robert D. Strochak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Robert D. Strochak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Kaplowitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Kaplowitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Kaplowitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Kaplowitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Kaplowitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Kaplowitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Kaplowitz. The network helps show where Daniel Kaplowitz may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1977240
2 1988236
3 198418
4 195815
5 196712
6 19688
7 19597
8 19596
9 19596
10 19594
11 19612
12 19580
13 19600

About Daniel Kaplowitz

Daniel Kaplowitz is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 554 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (6 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Psychology and Mental Health (1 paper), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper), Psychological Treatments and Disorders (1 paper) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (376 citations), Health (35 citations), Social Psychology (74 citations), General Psychology (7 citations) and Applied Psychology (14 citations). Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact