Daniel K. Gardner

21 papers receiving 153 citations

Peers

Daniel K. Gardner
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Cultural Studies 48
  • Religious studies 23
  • Sociology and Political Science 141
  • Philosophy 29
  • Political Science and International Relations 34
Replace John Makeham with:
John Makeham Australia
Linda S. Kauffman
David S. Nivison United States
Charles Robert Ageron
Jahan Ramazani United States
Katharine Hodgkin United Kingdom
Charles Bernheimer United States
P.J. Margry Netherlands
Fung Yu-lan
Valentina Napolitano Canada
Daniel K. Gardner relative to John Makeham Australia John Makeham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
John Makeham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel K. Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel K. Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel K. Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel K. Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel K. Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel K. Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel K. Gardner. The network helps show where Daniel K. Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Daniel K. Gardner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel K. Gardner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel K. Gardner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Four Books: The Basic Teachings of the Later Confucian Tradition
200752
2 201437
3 200328
4 198618
5 199815
6 199514
7 197814
8 198610
9 19918
10 20217
11 20225
12 20183
13 19862
14
Environmental Pollution in China: What Everyone Needs to Know®
20182
15 19892
16
Institutes of international law, public and private, as settled by the Supreme Court of the United States, and by our republic
19951
17 20131
18
A Treatise on International Law: And a Short Explanation of the Jurisdiction and Duty of the Government of the Republic of the United States
20041
19 19951
20 19841

About Daniel K. Gardner

Daniel K. Gardner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Law and Urban Studies, having authored 31 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (9 papers), Japanese History and Culture (5 papers), International Law and Aviation (2 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (2 papers), International Law and Human Rights (2 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (1 paper), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (48 citations), Religious studies (23 citations), Sociology and Political Science (141 citations), Philosophy (29 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (34 citations). Daniel K. Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Edward Slingerland, Tu Weiming, François Blais, Alexandra To, John T. Sullivan, Xinrong Ren, Yolanda A. Rankin, Marisol Wong-Villacrés, Ron Eglash and Denae Ford. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Asian Studies, JAMA, interactions, Philosophy East and West and Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact