Daniel James Klooster

946 citations
14 papers · 746 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel James Klooster

13 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers

Daniel James Klooster
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Global and Planetary Change 463
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 146
  • Business and International Management 34
  • Strategy and Management 165
  • Economics and Econometrics 128
Replace Roger Alex Clapp with:
Roger Alex Clapp Canada
Juan Manuel Torres‐Rojo Mexico
Andy White Canada
Jelle Hendrik Behagel Netherlands
Jessica de Koning Netherlands
Irmeli Mustalahti Finland
Dan Klooster United States
Frank Matose South Africa
Tiago N.P. dos Reis Belgium
Ashwin Ravikumar United States
Daniel James Klooster relative to Roger Alex Clapp Canada Roger Alex Clapp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Roger Alex Clapp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel James Klooster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel James Klooster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel James Klooster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel James Klooster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel James Klooster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel James Klooster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel James Klooster. The network helps show where Daniel James Klooster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Daniel James Klooster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel James Klooster Line = papers co-authored together Daniel James Klooster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2000190
2 2000186
3 200589
4 200278
5 200247
6 199946
7 201825
8 201723
9 200521
10 201318
11 201513
12 20229
13 20011
14 20210

About Daniel James Klooster

Daniel James Klooster is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Global and Planetary Change, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Business and International Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 746 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (8 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (7 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (3 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (1 paper) and Regional Development and Innovation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (463 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (146 citations), Business and International Management (34 citations), Strategy and Management (165 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (128 citations). Daniel James Klooster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Omar Masera, James P. Robson, Marie‐Christine Renard, Tad Mutersbaugh and Peter Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Economic Geography, Land Degradation and Development, Global Environmental Change, Environmental Conservation and Agriculture and Human Values.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact