Daniel J. Orchik

30 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Orchik
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Otorhinolaryngology 135
  • Sensory Systems 149
  • Neurology 151
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 139
  • Speech and Hearing 36
Replace J. G. Toner with:
J. G. Toner United Kingdom
L. Mauldin United States
M Decat Belgium
Michelangelo Lacilla Italy
R. F. Gray United Kingdom
Erez Bendet Israel
Ichiro Kirikae Japan
Christopher D. Bauch United States
A.F. van Olphen Netherlands
Leif Hergils Sweden
Daniel J. Orchik relative to J. G. Toner United Kingdom J. G. Toner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
J. G. Toner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Orchik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Orchik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Orchik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Orchik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Orchik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Orchik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Orchik. The network helps show where Daniel J. Orchik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Orchik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Orchik Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Orchik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197857
2 198144
3
Traumatic endolymphatic hydrops.
199533
4 197829
5
Transtympanic electrocochleography in Menière's disease using clicks and tone-bursts.
199329
6 199028
7 197728
8
Cochlear microphonics in Ménière's disease.
199727
9
Endolymphatic hydrops associated with otosclerosis.
199423
10 197622
11 197819
12 197315
13 197615
14 198714
15 19878
16 19857
17 19876
18 19835
19 19865
20 19864

About Daniel J. Orchik

Daniel J. Orchik is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Neurology, Otorhinolaryngology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 30 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (12 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (10 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (9 papers), Noise Effects and Management (6 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (6 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (6 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (3 papers) and Sinusitis and nasal conditions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (135 citations), Sensory Systems (149 citations), Neurology (151 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (139 citations) and Speech and Hearing (36 citations). Daniel J. Orchik has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include John J. Shea, John J. Shea, Louise‐Anne McNutt, John R. Emmett, Daniel S. Beasley, Margaret Sharp, Xianxi Ge, William M. Webb, Naijian Ge and William H. Moretz. Their work appears in journals such as Otolaryngology, International Journal of Audiology, Ear and Hearing, The Laryngoscope and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact