Daniel J. Hammel

2.0k citations
19 papers · 1.4k · h-index 12

Impact in

  • Urban Studies top 0.1%
    • Urban Planning and Governance
    • Urbanization and City Planning
    • Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Finance top 1%
    • Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism

Papers in

Daniel J. Hammel

19 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Daniel J. Hammel
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Urban Studies 682
  • Finance 528
  • Transportation 144
  • Economics and Econometrics 498
  • Sociology and Political Science 715
Replace Kathe Newman with:
Kathe Newman United States
Cody Hochstenbach Netherlands
Wouter van Gent Netherlands
Wim Ostendorf Netherlands
Blair Badcock Australia
Θωμάς Μαλούτας Greece
Ngai Ming Yip Hong Kong
Jan van Weesep Netherlands
Marinus C. Deurloo Netherlands
Rowan Arundel Netherlands
Daniel J. Hammel relative to Kathe Newman United States Kathe Newman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Kathe Newman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Hammel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Hammel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Hammel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Hammel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Hammel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Hammel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Hammel. The network helps show where Daniel J. Hammel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Hammel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Hammel Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Hammel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1999293
2 2009213
3 2004162
4 1996152
5 2008107
6 201494
7 200472
8 199870
9 199964
10 199954
11 200028
12 200120
13 20199
14 20139
15 20088
16 20005
17 19984
18 20111
19
Neoliberal Housing Policy and the Gentrification of the American Urban System
20021

About Daniel J. Hammel

Daniel J. Hammel is a scholar working on Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies and Accounting, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Housing Market and Economics (13 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (13 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (9 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (6 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (3 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (2 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (1 paper) and Statistics Education and Methodologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (682 citations), Finance (528 citations), Transportation (144 citations), Economics and Econometrics (498 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (715 citations). Daniel J. Hammel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Elvin Wyly, Markus Moos, Mona Atia, Qiyan Wu, Xiaohui Wu, Jianquan Cheng, Eric S. Belsky, David H. Kaplan, Kathe Newman and Philip Ashton. Their work appears in journals such as Housing Policy Debate, Urban Geography, Urban Studies, Geografiska Annaler Series B Human Geography and Journal of Urban Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact