Daniel J. Bell

38 papers receiving 552 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Bell
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Health 99
  • Gender Studies 73
  • Political Science and International Relations 107
  • Otorhinolaryngology 18
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 74
Replace Matthew M. Miller with:
Matthew M. Miller United States
John A. Hostetler United States
Michael L. Black Australia
Elisabetta Mamolini Italy
Johnson Jh United States
Yōko Imaizumi Japan
Martin Martín United States
Charlotte Hanson United States
Robert Jackson United Kingdom
Mike Bamshad United States
Daniel J. Bell relative to Matthew M. Miller United States Matthew M. Miller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.9×
Matthew M. Miller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Bell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Bell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Bell. The network helps show where Daniel J. Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Bell Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Bell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201374
2
Policewomen: Myths and reality.
198262
3 198238
4 199433
5 200933
6 200532
7 198032
8 200830
9 201028
10 200925
11 202124
12 201221
13 201120
14 199818
15 198517
16 198612
17 199112
18
The Police Response to Domestic Violence: An Exploratory Study
198411
19 201210
20 201210

About Daniel J. Bell

Daniel J. Bell is a scholar working on Plant Science, Health, Sociology and Political Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Surgery, having authored 41 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Berry genetics and cultivation research (8 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (5 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (4 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (99 citations), Gender Studies (73 citations), Political Science and International Relations (107 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (18 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (74 citations). Daniel J. Bell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Lisa J. Rowland, F. A. Drummond, Richard J. Lundman, Harpreet K. Pannu, James Polashock, Marietta Scott, Lawrence H. Schwartz, Harold H. Harrison, Dapeng Zhang and Helen Mann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Criminal Justice, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-) and Theriogenology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact