Daniel Humme

682 citations
24 papers · 470 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Humme

23 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers

Daniel Humme
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Dermatology 247
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 104
  • Immunology 113
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 97
  • Rehabilitation 23
Replace Annette Klein with:
Annette Klein Germany
Silje Haukali Omland Denmark
Adewonuola Alase United Kingdom
Victor Desmond Mandel Italy
Filiberto Cedeno‐Laurent United States
Joya Sahu United States
J. Roewert-Huber Germany
F. Abuzahra Germany
Karoline Zepter Switzerland
Alexander A. Merleev United States
Daniel Humme relative to Annette Klein Germany Annette Klein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Annette Klein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Humme

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Humme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Humme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Humme more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Humme

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Humme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Humme. The network helps show where Daniel Humme may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Humme, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Humme Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Humme links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200988
2 201461
3 201051
4 201435
5 201627
6 201023
7 201422
8 201321
9 201518
10 201118
11 201417
12 200814
13 201413
14 202012
15 20149
16 20168
17 20138
18 20217
19 20155
20
Diagnostic tools in mycosis fungoides.
20105

About Daniel Humme

Daniel Humme is a scholar working on Dermatology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Immunology, Epidemiology and Oncology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (16 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (3 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (3 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (2 papers) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (247 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (104 citations), Immunology (113 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (97 citations) and Rehabilitation (23 citations). Daniel Humme has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Marc Beyer, Wolfram Sterry, Markus Möbs, Staffan Vandersee, Klaus‐Dieter Weltmann, Axel Krämer, Alexa Patzelt, Peter Hinz, Olaf Lademann and Heike Richter. Their work appears in journals such as JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, British Journal of Dermatology, PLoS ONE, Journal of Investigative Dermatology and Experimental Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact