Chalid Assaf

117 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Chalid Assaf
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Dermatology 1.8k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.4k
  • Immunology 734
  • Oncology 656
  • Epidemiology 680
Replace Xiao Ni with:
Xiao Ni United States
Raquel Villuendas Spain
Daniel Wu United States
Thomas Jouary France
András Schaffer United States
Puthiyaveettil N. Raghunath United States
Floyd E. Fox United States
A. Hafeez Diwan United States
Carsten Weishaupt Germany
Meg R. Gerstenblith United States
Chalid Assaf relative to Xiao Ni United States Xiao Ni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Xiao Ni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chalid Assaf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chalid Assaf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chalid Assaf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chalid Assaf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chalid Assaf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chalid Assaf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chalid Assaf. The network helps show where Chalid Assaf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chalid Assaf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chalid Assaf Line = papers co-authored together Chalid Assaf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 123 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017279
2 1996181
3 2010155
4 2000153
5 2009142
6 2007118
7 1999112
8 2012104
9 199986
10 200684
11 200083
12 200777
13 200974
14 201673
15 200670
16 200768
17 200865
18 200259
19 200656
20 201253

About Chalid Assaf

Chalid Assaf is a scholar working on Dermatology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Immunology and Oncology, having authored 123 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (85 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (46 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (22 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (22 papers), Nail Diseases and Treatments (14 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (8 papers) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (1.8k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.4k citations), Immunology (734 citations), Oncology (656 citations) and Epidemiology (680 citations). Chalid Assaf has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Hummel, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos, Wolfram Sterry, Harald Stein, Reinhard Dummer, Sergij Goerdt, Madeleine Duvic, Constantin E. Orfanos, Edgar Dippel and Sean Whittaker. Their work appears in journals such as JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, Blood, Journal of Investigative Dermatology, European Journal of Cancer and British Journal of Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact