Daniel Harper

27 papers receiving 936 citations

Peers

Daniel Harper
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 185
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 111
  • Physiology 309
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 212
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 151
Replace Alexandre Silva de Quevedo with:
Alexandre Silva de Quevedo Brazil
Andrew M. Youssef United States
Bruce Victor Freeman Canada
Hong‐You Ge Denmark
Antonietta Romaniello Italy
S. K. Jääskeläinen Finland
Sreepadma Sonty United States
Anson E. Kairys United States
Wiebke Gandhi Canada
Jen-I Chen Canada
Daniel Harper relative to Alexandre Silva de Quevedo Brazil Alexandre Silva de Quevedo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Alexandre Silva de Quevedo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Harper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Harper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Harper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Harper. The network helps show where Daniel Harper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Harper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Harper Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Harper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016143
2 2016142
3 2009136
4 201891
5 201885
6 201747
7 201442
8 200639
9 201139
10
Discordant Dry Eye Disease (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).
201624
11 201418
12 202118
13 201617
14 201717
15 201816
16 202116
17 201213
18 201812
19 202112
20 20227

About Daniel Harper

Daniel Harper is a scholar working on Complementary and Manual Therapy, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Dermatology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 961 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (12 papers), Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (8 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (7 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Treatments (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and Manual Therapy (185 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (111 citations), Physiology (309 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (212 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (151 citations). Daniel Harper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Joseph Clauw, Andrew Schrepf, Mark Hollins, Steven E. Harte, Eric Ichesco, Richard Edmund Harris, William D. Maixner, Johnson P. Hampson, Muhammad Siddiqi and Pei Feng Lim. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Journal of Pain, PAIN Reports, Journal of Dental Research and Arthritis & Rheumatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact