Daniel Graeber
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Modeling and Simulation top 10%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Papers in
-
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies 3
-
- Employment and Welfare Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Alexander S. Kritikos (4 shared papers)Carsten Schröder (2 shared papers)Marco Caliendo (1 shared paper)Toshihiro Okubo (1 shared paper)Peter Hans Matthews (1 shared paper)Niels Michalski (1 shared paper)Michelle R. McCauley (1 shared paper)Sabine Zinn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)European Journal of Political Economy (1 paper)Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (1 paper)Journal of Population Economics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomFinland
In The Last Decade
Daniel Graeber
11 papers receiving 246 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Health 84
- Modeling and Simulation 43
- Economics and Econometrics 83
- Management of Technology and Innovation 19
- Psychiatry and Mental health 29
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Graeber
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Graeber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Graeber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Graeber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Graeber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Graeber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Graeber. The network helps show where Daniel Graeber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Graeber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 98 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 77 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 33 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 9 | Doctoral Researchers in the Leibniz Association: Final Report of the 2017 Leibniz PhD Survey | 2019 | 1 |
| 10 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 0 |
About Daniel Graeber
Daniel Graeber is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (3 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (3 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (84 citations), Modeling and Simulation (43 citations), Economics and Econometrics (83 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (19 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (29 citations). Daniel Graeber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Alexander S. Kritikos, Carsten Schröder, Marco Caliendo, Toshihiro Okubo, Peter Hans Matthews, Niels Michalski, Michelle R. McCauley, Sabine Zinn, Claudia Hövener and Julia Berazneva. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Scientific Reports, European Journal of Political Economy, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization and Journal of Population Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.