Daniel Goffman
Impact in
- Anthropology top 10%
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade
-
- Islamic Studies and History
- Turkey's Politics and Society
Papers in
-
- Ottoman Empire History and Society 4
- Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies 2
-
- Islamic Studies and History 5
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 2
- Co-authors
- Bruce Masters (2 shared papers)Edhem Eldem (2 shared papers)Baruch Kimmerling (2 shared papers)D. J. Sullivan (2 shared papers)L. Thomas (1 shared paper)Michael Beard (1 shared paper)Ellis Goldberg (1 shared paper)Susan L. Schaefer (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (2 papers)Studia Islamica (1 paper)New Perspectives on Turkey (1 paper)Middle East Studies Association Bulletin (3 papers)Journal of the American Oriental Society (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Goffman
14 papers receiving 136 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Anthropology 52
- Political Science and International Relations 110
- History 40
- Classics 9
- Space and Planetary Science 3
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Goffman
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Goffman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Goffman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Goffman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Goffman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Goffman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Goffman. The network helps show where Daniel Goffman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Goffman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 87 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 32 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 21 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 14 | |
| 5 | Britons in the Ottoman Empire, 1642-1660 | 1998 | 11 |
| 6 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 13 | İzmir ve Levanten dünya, 1550-1650 | 1995 | 1 |
| 14 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0 |
About Daniel Goffman
Daniel Goffman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Archeology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 197 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (5 papers), Ottoman Empire History and Society (4 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Ottoman and Turkish Studies (2 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (2 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (52 citations), Political Science and International Relations (110 citations), History (40 citations), Classics (9 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (3 citations). Daniel Goffman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bruce Masters, Edhem Eldem, Baruch Kimmerling, D. J. Sullivan, L. Thomas, Michael Beard, Ellis Goldberg, Susan L. Schaefer, F. Gregory Gause and G. Wilse Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Studia Islamica, New Perspectives on Turkey, Middle East Studies Association Bulletin and Journal of the American Oriental Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.