Daniel Geschke

697 citations
19 papers · 451 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Geschke

18 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Daniel Geschke
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Communication 90
  • Sociology and Political Science 310
  • Applied Psychology 29
  • Social Psychology 104
  • Gender Studies 45
Replace Anna E. Clark with:
Anna E. Clark Netherlands
Sungeun Chung South Korea
Frederic R. Hopp United States
Russell Clark United States
Laura Janelle Gornick United States
Christina Peter Germany
Denise Sommer Germany
Toshikazu Yoshida Japan
Alyssa C. Morey United States
Erin L. Spottswood United States
Daniel Geschke relative to Anna E. Clark Netherlands Anna E. Clark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Anna E. Clark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Geschke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Geschke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Geschke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Geschke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Geschke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Geschke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Geschke. The network helps show where Daniel Geschke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Geschke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Geschke Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Geschke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2018156
2 2003108
3 201041
4 201031
5 201226
6 201519
7 201514
8 201511
9 201810
10 201610
11 20168
12 20175
13 20073
14 20153
15 20153
16 20241
17 20181
18 20101
19
Der Einfluss von rechtsgerichtetem Autoritarismus und sozialer Dominanzorientierung auf homophobe Einstellungen
20160

About Daniel Geschke

Daniel Geschke is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Communication, Political Science and International Relations and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), German legal, social, and political studies (3 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers) and Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (90 citations), Sociology and Political Science (310 citations), Applied Psychology (29 citations), Social Psychology (104 citations) and Gender Studies (45 citations). Daniel Geschke has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Peter Holtz, Jan Lorenz, Rainer Banse, Bertram Gawronski, Wolfgang Frindte, Denise Sommer, Georg Ruhrmann, Kai Sassenberg, Friedrich Funke and Thomas Kessler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications, British Journal of Social Psychology, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Political Psychology and European Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact