Daniel Geschke

697 citations
12 papers · 364 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Geschke

12 papers receiving 338 citations

Peers

Daniel Geschke
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Communication 77
  • Sociology and Political Science 265
  • Applied Psychology 26
  • Social Psychology 88
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 51
Replace Anna E. Clark with:
Anna E. Clark Netherlands
Russell Clark United States
Laura Janelle Gornick United States
Toshikazu Yoshida Japan
Alyssa C. Morey United States
Penny Triệu United States
Denise Sommer Germany
Daniel M. Rempala United States
Killian Lorcan McLoughlin United States
Hannes Rosenbusch Netherlands
Daniel Geschke relative to Anna E. Clark Netherlands Anna E. Clark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Anna E. Clark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Geschke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Geschke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Geschke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Geschke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Geschke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Geschke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Geschke. The network helps show where Daniel Geschke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Geschke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Geschke Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Geschke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2018142
2 2003100
3 201033
4 201028
5 201223
6 201515
7 201810
8 20157
9 20172
10 20072
11 20241
12 20181

About Daniel Geschke

Daniel Geschke is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Communication, Political Science and International Relations and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (2 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (77 citations), Sociology and Political Science (265 citations), Applied Psychology (26 citations), Social Psychology (88 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (51 citations). Daniel Geschke has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Jan Lorenz, Peter Holtz, Bertram Gawronski, Rainer Banse, Denise Sommer, Georg Ruhrmann, Kai Sassenberg, Wolfgang Frindte, Friedrich Funke and Amélie Mummendey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications, British Journal of Social Psychology, Political Psychology, European Journal of Social Psychology and Journal of Language and Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact