Anna E. Clark
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cultural Differences and Values
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 6
-
- Cultural Differences and Values 3
- Emotions and Moral Behavior 1
- Co-authors
- Yoshihisa Kashima (6 shared papers)Kim Peters (1 shared paper)Olivier Klein (2 shared papers)Anthony Lyons (4 shared papers)Gün R. Semin (3 shared papers)Gabriela M. Jiga‐Boy (2 shared papers)Allison W. McIntyre (1 shared paper)Tim Kurz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Social Cognition (2 papers)Psychological Science (1 paper)English Studies (1 paper)ELH (1 paper)Asian Journal Of Social Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anna E. Clark
15 papers receiving 401 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Social Psychology 186
- Communication 53
- Applied Psychology 32
- Sociology and Political Science 291
- Literature and Literary Theory 61
Countries citing papers authored by Anna E. Clark
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna E. Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna E. Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna E. Clark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna E. Clark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna E. Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna E. Clark. The network helps show where Anna E. Clark may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Anna E. Clark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 119 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 119 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 5 | Cultural dynamics of stereotyping : Social network processes and the perpetuation of stereotypes | 2008 | 21 |
| 6 | 2003 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0 |
About Anna E. Clark
Anna E. Clark is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper), Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies (1 paper) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (186 citations), Communication (53 citations), Applied Psychology (32 citations), Sociology and Political Science (291 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (61 citations). Anna E. Clark has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Yoshihisa Kashima, Kim Peters, Olivier Klein, Anthony Lyons, Gün R. Semin, Gabriela M. Jiga‐Boy, Allison W. McIntyre, Tim Kurz, Andrea Castelletti and Rafael Schmitt. Their work appears in journals such as Social Cognition, Psychological Science, English Studies, ELH and Asian Journal Of Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.