Daniel F. B. Wright

70 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel F. B. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Nephrology 215
  • Family Practice 38
  • Pharmacology 140
  • Internal Medicine 32
  • Statistics and Probability 82
Replace Simon de Denus with:
Simon de Denus Canada
Michael B. Bottorff United States
Sophie L. Stocker Australia
Rikke Sørensen Denmark
Brian S. Decker United States
D. H. Lawson United Kingdom
R. Lassalle France
Antonios Douros Germany
Stephanie Läer Germany
George S. Cembrowski Canada
Daniel F. B. Wright relative to Simon de Denus Canada Simon de Denus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Simon de Denus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel F. B. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel F. B. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel F. B. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel F. B. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel F. B. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel F. B. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel F. B. Wright. The network helps show where Daniel F. B. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel F. B. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel F. B. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Daniel F. B. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020120
2 2010100
3 199270
4 201169
5 201543
6 201443
7 201840
8 201237
9 201436
10 201329
11 201726
12 201324
13 201124
14 201924
15 201421
16
The epidemiology of forestry work-related injuries in New Zealand, 1975-88: fatalities and hospitalisations.
199420
17 201819
18 201819
19 201717
20 201617

About Daniel F. B. Wright

Daniel F. B. Wright is a scholar working on Nephrology, Pharmacology, Statistics and Probability, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (20 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (12 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (11 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (8 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (8 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (6 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (6 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (215 citations), Family Practice (38 citations), Pharmacology (140 citations), Internal Medicine (32 citations) and Statistics and Probability (82 citations). Daniel F. B. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen B. Duffull, Helen Winter, Murray L. Barclay, Lisa K. Stamp, Megan Anakin, Tony R. Merriman, H. M. Perry, Nicola Dalbeth, Evan J. Begg and Robert Walker. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacokinetics, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical and Translational Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact